Transitioning to Palliative Care in an Italian Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Network.

BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that end-of-life management for patients affected by acute decompensated heart failure in cardiac intensive care units is aggressive, with late or no engagement of palliative care teams. OBJECTIVE: To assess current palliative care and end-of-life practices in a contemporary Italian multicenter registry of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: A survey-based approach was used to collect data on palliative care and end-of-life management practices. The AltShock-2 registry enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock from 12 participating centers. A subset of 153 patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure enrolled between March 2020 and March 2023 was analyzed, with a focus on early engagement of palliative care teams and deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). RESULTS: "Do not resuscitate" orders were documented in patient records in only 5 of 12 centers (42%). Palliative care teams were engaged for 21 of 153 enrolled patients (13.7%). Among the 51 patients with ICDs, 6 of 17 patients who died (35%) had defibrillator deactivation. Of the 17 patients who died, 13 died in the hospital and 4 died within 6 months after discharge; 1 patient had ICD deactivation supported by palliative care services at home. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy-limiting practices, including ICD deactivation, are not routine in the Italian centers participating in this study. The results emphasize the importance of integrating palliative care as a simultaneous process with intensive care to address the unmet needs of these patients and their families.

Endomyocardial Biopsy: The Forgotten Piece in the Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Puzzle.

Background Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is part of 2010 Task Force Criteria (TFC) for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). However, its usage has been curtailed because of its low presumed diagnostic yield, and it is now a poorly used tool. This study aims to analyze the contribution of EMB to the final diagnosis of ARVC. Methods and Results We included 104 consecutive patients evaluated for a suspicion of ARVC, who were referred for EMB. Patients with suspected left dominant pattern were excluded from the primary analysis. Subjects were initially stratified according to TFC without considering EMB. After EMB, patients were reclassified accordingly, and the reclassification rate was calculated. EMB yielded a diagnostic finding in 92 patients (85.5%). After including EMB evaluation, 20 (43%) more patients "at risk" received a definite diagnosis of ARVC. Overall, 59 patients received a definite diagnosis of ARVC, 34% only after EMB. EMB appeared to be the better-performing exam with respect to the final diagnosis (ß, 2.2; area uder the curve, 0.73; P<0.05). The reclassification improvement after EMB measured 28%. TFC score increased from 3.5±1.3 to 4.3±1.4 (P<0.001). Notably, active inflammation was present in 6 (10%) patients. Minor complications were reported in only 2% of the cohort. In patients with suspected left-dominant disease, conventional TFC performed poorly. Conclusions Electroanatomic voltage mapping-guided EMB was safe and yielded an optimal diagnostic yield. It allowed upgrading of the diagnosis of nearly one-third of the patients considered "at risk." Classical TFC without EMB performed poorly in patients with the left dominant form of ARVC.

Prognostic Value of Peak Oxygen Uptake in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices (PRO-VAD).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine whether peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) and other cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)-derived variables could predict intermediate-term mortality in stable continuous flow LVAD recipients. BACKGROUND: pVO2 is a cornerstone in the selection of patients for heart transplantation, but the prognostic power of pVO2 obtained in patients treated with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is unknown. METHODS: We collected data for pVO2 and outcomes in adult LVAD recipients in a retrospective, multicenter study and evaluated cutoff values for pVO2 including: 1) values above or below medians; 2) grouping patients in tertiles; and 3) pVO2 ≤14 ml/kg/min if the patient was not treated with beta-blockers (BB) or pVO2 ≤12 ml/kg/min if the patient was taking BB therapy. RESULTS: Nine centers contributed data from 450 patients. Patients were 53 ± 13 years of age; 78% were male; body mass index was 25 ± 5 kg/m2 with few comorbidities (stroke: 11%; diabetes: 18%; and peripheral artery disease: 4%). The cause of heart failure (HF) was most often nonischemic (66%). Devices included were the HeartMate II and 3 (Abbott); and Heartware ventricular assist devices Jarvik and Duraheart (Medtronic). The index CPET was performed at a median of 189 days (154-225 days) after LVAD implantation, and mean pVO2 was 14.1 ± 5 ml/kg/min (47% ± 14% of predicted value). Lower pVO2 values were strongly associated with poorer survival regardless of whether patients were analyzed for absolute pVO2 in ml/kg/min, pVO2 ≤12 BB/14 ml/kg/min, or as a percentage of predicted pVO2 values (P ≤ 0.001 for all). For patients with pVO2 >12 BB/14 and ventilation/carbon dioxide relationship (VE/VCO2) slope <35, the 1-year survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Even after LVAD implantation, pVO2 has prognostic value, similar to HF patients not supported by mechanical circulatory support devices. (PROgnostic Value of Exercise Capacity Measured as Peak Oxygen Uptake [pVO2] in Recipients of Left Ventricular Assist Devices [PRO-VAD]; NCT04423562).